Discussion in 'Off Topic' started by scylla, Jan 26, 2010.
True, very true
You essentially closed the post. LOL, you basically stated what was wrong with what she has done. So now what? What do we speak about?
Lion's don't care when they chase ... gazelles. Nomnomnom.
we boil lobsters alive, whats the difference with the cat? its smarter?
you obviously have never seen cats before then.
given i'm not all for killing cats in the oven. If you want to eat it, make its death quick.
As punishment, that girl should be cooked in that same oven.
I say they lock up every hunter for two years for killing dear.
I say they lock up every fisherman for two years for killing fish.
I say they lock up ever momma for two years who's ever swatted a pore little innocent fly, or stomped on that clean little cockroach. Now THAT'S animal torture!!!
I say they lock up every human for two years that chopped of the head of a chicken, or turkey or...
If there's going to punish people for killing an animal, they might as well punish everyone else!!! For those of you in Rio Linda, I'm nearly a vegetarian!!!! Spam and corn gods are just too good to give up!! They might as well lock me up for two years!!
Where do you stop? For everyone that chops a tree down, chop of his legs?
For everyone out driving and a hundred bugs explode on the front of the car, ... I dunno. You could get silly.
Difference is.... you eat the fish, chicken, etc. The cat just ..I dunno, melted? Exploded?
probably burned, the cat would melt and explode as much as a dead turkey in the oven.
Hmm , Weird News , Reminded me of ALF , anyone watched that sitcom ? Hell i loved it
Exactly what I think. It's half because she has no respect for life, even a cat's. It's half because she killed the cat for spite, not because she intended to eat it, not because it attacked her. I'd be concerned that if she kills a cat for the lulz, what prevents her from torturing and killing humans for lulz? Sounds a bit antisocial to me (as in the clinical term).
Tell me again why you would ever eat a cat when you have a kitchen full of OTHER food?
She didn't eat it, she put it in the oven and left the house.
She took a very dreadful way to kill that cat. If she wanna kill they she should have given poison to that cat or shot her with piston or any other way of quick death. Try to think how anybody will feel on oven.
If you read the article, you would've seen that the purpose of killing the cat was to bring terror to the cat's owners. Simply shooting or poisoning the cat wouldn't have the full effect that the criminal would have wanted. Basically, she wanted the cat to be tortured so when the owners came back home, they would feel more terrorized and angry.
You are right... She did not put the cat in oven for eating... She want to murder the cat... found no other option and put it into oven
Separate names with a comma.