Bandwidth/month messed up?

Status
Not open for further replies.

t2t2t

New Member
Messages
690
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Somehow it shows CRAZY amounts of used Bandwidth in my cpanel:

frontend/x/stats/bandwidth.html said:
Apr 2007
t2t2.x10hosting.com 12.42 Meg
habombers.t2t2.x10hosting.com 3.87 Gig
Total 3.89 Gig

Meantime awStats shows different amounts.

Statistics of: t2t2.x10hosting.com said:
Reported period: Apr 2007
Bandwidth: 8.59 MB
Statistics of: habombers.t2t2.x10hosting.com said:
Reported period: Apr 2007
Bandwidth: 845.00 MB

Also i haven't been using FTP so much to get 2GB extra.

Server: Sustained - Since 03-26-2007
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Micro

Retired staff <i> (11-12-2008)</I>
Messages
1,301
Reaction score
0
Points
36
Hmm. I once got 600mb of traffic for an empty site, so there must be people coming to it.

I dunno, the statistics are generated off the logs so if someone made one typo in the php for the stats programs then its screwed anyway.
 

Corey

I Break Things
Staff member
Messages
34,551
Reaction score
204
Points
63
I wouldn't worry about it unless you're getting close to your limit.
 

Livewire

Abuse Compliance Officer
Staff member
Messages
18,169
Reaction score
216
Points
63
Theory because I have no idea how the stats are calculated: does one take the browser cache into consideration? Meaning, does AWStats just track the bytes actually transfered, as opposed to the total size of the webpage including graphics?

I'll try to explain better: say you have a graphic intensive website. You log in, download the graphics. AWStats and the other stats track it properly right now - you've downloaded (for example) 30kb of images, and 10kb of html code.

You come back the next day. You still have all the images in your cache so they don't get downloaded again. AWStats tracks the 10kb of html that you download again but doesn't count the images since they never got transfered. However, the other stats still counts you for 30kb of images even though you already had them.


Just a thought, but it still wouldn't account for a gap of 2gb (unless my example of 30kb in images is unrealistic and it's closer to 100 or something). Probably wrong (I know next to nothing about the HTTP protocol and how AWStats and the other statistics thing work), but just a thought. Feel free to have a mod take this post and put "Removed - total BS" in it's place if I'm wrong (or tell me and I'll do it ^_^ )
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top