Joker Boy
New Member
- Messages
- 660
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
The Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 sought to ban indecent speech and pornographic images from the Internet to protect minors from reading or viewing such material. Civil liberties advocates filed a lawsuit claiming that the CDA would also deny adults' rights to view pornography, a violation of the First Amendment protection of free speech. In the following viewpoint, excerpted from the Supreme Court decision striking down the CDA, John Paul Stevens supports the civil rights view, concluding that the CDA is unconstitutional. Stevens is a justice of the U.S. Supreme Court.
What do you think? Should they cencor this stuff just because of children? I think they should because it is wrong and just repulsive!
What do you think? Should they cencor this stuff just because of children? I think they should because it is wrong and just repulsive!