Search results

Of course PS3's interface is standard with Sony's line. It still doesn't change the fact that it's not as good as the 360s. Over half of the movies on Blu-Ray are in the $25-30 range. The $15-20 ones are the very old movies from the 1950s or they are really bad. There's really no point in...

A standard look means that it uses a uniform look for both the dashboard and the guide. The settings aren't all over the place either. They are in the "settings" tab. And are you kidding me? Have you been out from under your rock? Most Blu-Ray movies cost in the 25-30 range. Don't believe me...

Defend the interface all you want, it still doesn't change the fact that there are better ones out there like the 360s. It's standard look and Xbox Live integration make it ahead by miles. PS3's interface is not bad it's just not the best. Have you checked Walmart lately? Blu-Ray movies are...

Really, only hundreds?

It's not made by Infinity Ward so I wouldn't put your hopes up for this one.

You realize that it still won't get it? The 40gb version does not have PS2 backwards compatibility. It's that simple.

Because PS3's online is crap in comparison. $50 a year for quality isn't bad.

How about instead of trolling you actually post useful information that supports your position. Otherwise you have contributed absolutely nothing to the topic. On topic there are tons of inaccuracies in this thread, especially coming from the people who blindly support the PS3. Other things...

Raping and burning babies is totally super.

I'm telling you, you're wrong. There is no PS2 backwards compatibility in the 40gb PS3 and there wont for the foreseeable future.

That'd be ok if it was talking about the PS3 vs 360 but it's the PS3 vs PS2.

Simple as what? That's not even the topic here. The reason the initial price of the PS3 was so high ($600) was because Sony thought the Playstation name would sell no matter the price. This turned out to be a huge mistake and the price drops ensued in the months to come. We now have seen like...

He's not wrong.

Movies are the only way the PS3 can actually be a justified purchase in a lot of peoples eyes. That's why it's always included in these arguments. It's all the PS3 has against the 360. I covered graphics in this post. I stated most games look the same or better on the 360, which is fact. The...

Time out!

He's not wrong at all. The 360's DVD drive reads data a lot faster than Blu-Ray discs. Blu-ray is read at a slower rate. That's why many games require an install so that they can be comparable to the 360 counter part. Most are not "way lower", that depends on the game.

I'm glad you like it more than Halo 2 and 3. The majority of the gaming community thinks Halo is still a better game. Personally, it's hard for any game to top Halo 3's Forge, and Theater. But who cares? You like the game, most people don't. Obviously you wouldn't have bought it (at full...

Be a rebel all you want. Call Americans sheep till your lungs burst. I could care less because at the end of the day I know I have the comfort of not wasting $60 on a ****ty game because I researched it, found out the game was mediocre and generic. I feel bad for everyone who did give into the...

I'd rather trust the sum of all the reviews of the major review sites then some obscure person on a message board. If a game's average is 75 or higher it's most likely a quality game. Anything 70 to 60 is worth a rental and anything below that is avoided. Haze is at 58, it's a rental at most...

I'd trust the opinion of all the reviews averaged together than some person on a message board. The fact of the matter is that the game is a very generic, mediocre shooter that only really worth a rental.