Search results

When I try to enter my username and password, it returns the error: Username:vekou

I wanted to start a forum game, too bad it's unsuited for the forums. The rules? Be very creative in trash-talking anyone who posts before you...

Hypothetically speaking, what about those legitimate users who are already past the 1GB mark?

Re: Your server is running PHP version 4.4.9 but WordPress 3.2.1 requires at least 5. It did state in the status page that there still are a few maintenance works to be done, but generally, the swap is done, so I thought I should inform everyone about the error. I know that the PHP version is...

According to status.x10hosting.com, the swap has been finished, so I figured I needed to report this, this may be due to the chassis swap on Chopin. When I go the the Wordpress wp-admin, it returns the following error: Your server is running PHP version 4.4.9 but WordPress 3.2.1 requires at...

I'm not sure about Lotus, but in Chopin it is located under Software/Services.

Well, for starters, CloudFlare caches your static content (images, stylesheets, scripts, large images, and did i say images?) and saves it to THEIR fast servers, which means, when a users surfs your site, all those static contents will be loaded from THEIR servers, which means less work for x10...

I think, commercial use in general, is where a user uses his/her website to earn money by selling tangible and/or intangible things such as software, books, services, etc. As long as the website is intended for business purposes, then it is commercial. While personal use refer to personal usage...

I guess we can skip the Cloudflare plugin since it's embedded in W3 Total Cache. Automattic claims that Jetpack runs mainly on their server so, I want to believe that it uses low resources. I suggest testing CPU-intensive plugins, like the ones people use for galleries and modify an image...

I think, this new system will change the tides towards WordPress users. Before, we are not recommended to use caching plugins since it can cause HRUs. But now, I think it is recommended to use caching plugins. The only time the CPU usage will rise is during the initial caching of the pages...

I was referring to the Litespeed version. Apparently, their website lists two version, the Standard and Enterprise, http://litespeedtech.com/litespeed-web-server-editions.html. I was just wondering which version is being used on the free hosting servers, since using the paid will incur...

is the litespeed that you are using a free or enterprise version?

I voted for Against even though I'm not 100% against it. In most countries that states in their constitution about the preservation of life, etc, I think it's a bit unconstitutional, if you look at it in a different kind of point of view. It is undeniable that sometimes the only way to stop a...

I think it would be on version 10. But if you ask me about what version Chrome will be on June 2012, it probably be on version 125.0.89.0. With its versioning system, it could go on thousands.

nice one. i just wish that websites aren't categorized only on one category. Most websites, especially personal blogs dwells into multiple topics.

Hi, I recently set my primary domain thru the account panel to "aitenshiproject.com" and now it displays the Default Web Site Page. Need help in setting it up. Thanks. EDIT: After clearing the DNS a multitude of times and restarting the browser, it is now working. Thanks anyway.

it's quite true that co.cc sucks big time when it comes to abuse reports! but getting back to the point, it is a fact that not all of co.cc users are spam or abusive accounts. i believe that Google should somehow whitelist those sites that are proven to be legitimate, those without bad records...

well, i believe that domain names are not the one to be blocked, but the IP of the servers from which the fraudulent and abusive sites came from. A fraudulent website can have many domain names, so blocking the domain name doesn't mean shutting down the house entirely, but just closing only one...

i think google should've just placed a warning page, like they used to for malware sites, instead of removing them all completely. but on the other side, spammers have been dramatically decreased.

I know some of you have heard that co.cc subdomains have been blocked by Google a few weeks ago. That would mean that nobody here who have set their domains to co.cc won't appear in Google search results. They said that it was to prevent abuse. So do you think this move was the right thing to...