Forecasting is a wrong term here - it's been a week of no email and no access for me. Disaster is perhaps too dramatic too. But it is well under way, whatever it is. Anyone who needs the services we've been denied is likely to be gone already, and those who don't are probably irrelevant anyway (they will probably not upgrade to a paid tier). Is denying services to free customers a good way to get rid of them? It is not a grownup way, it is not good in any moral sense, but it will accomplish just that. If I put on my 'capitalist' hat, it is a good thing for the company to not waste resources on freeloaders. Removing the hat, with my 'anarchist' bald-cap on, I think that providing a no-charge place for people to do stuff usually leads to wonderful things, if you can minimize the overhead.
With that, I've been extremely grateful to X10. They did the right thing, until now. I don't know what is happening now, even remotely. I would totally be supportive if I was told up-front that due to CPanel replacement there is no access to my account for updates, so things remain frozen. I would be fine if I was warned that email would be shut down for a month (with a little notice). Or even everything shut down for a month. A few days notice would be fine.
But CPanel is not a good reason to turn off all services. It's an excuse - legally speaking. CPanel screwed its licensees by denying free access to an installed base of customers. X10 turned around and screwed us the same way, without notice. CPanel is a separate front end for managing stuff. If it is erased, the email server, the web server, ftp access etc. continues functioning. But whatever.