Well, so far we have you outnumbered two to one. That's two of us and one of you -- but I have a feeling there's more than the three of us using the site. Maybe the lack of response is because you didn't include an "indeterminate" option. There's no "neuter" either.
Seriously, though, Jessica -- what kind of results were you expecting? The average forum-dweller is a fish-belly-white*, socially inept pizza-munching vampire type (well, allergic to the sun's rays, in any case) who has a more fascinating and spiritually significant relationship with his/her computer than with any living person. Oh, I'm sure there are more than a few females who fall into that category, but you double-exxers have traditionally gone to an excess of cats as a way of avoiding human contact. We, on the other hand, have a long, strong tradition of hiding in dark places, scribbling manifestos and working past the point of exhaustion to prove that someone, somewhere, was wrong. All that's changed in our imaginary world is that people are reading our manifestos and replying to our writing to prove to anyone who's not a moron just how very wrong (and stupid) they are. It's not much of an adjustment, really. You (the collective you) need to reconcile yourselves to the fact that your cat substitutes are not only not ignoring you (as any real cat will) but are actively responding. That's a lot of bred-in-the-bones behaviour to overcome in a single generation. I'd say I welcome the change, but then I think of what a sad, sad thing my life has become...
* or as close to fish-belly white as your skin's natural pigmentation will allow you to be, at least -- we're talkin' complete absence of tan or any evidence that tanning is, in fact, possible.