"I'm sure you will want to have the "last" word" Unlike you then! Well, since you insist
............
"and we would never agree" - I actually do agree with some points you have made, just not all of them. And I respect the way you have made & explained your arguments.
"there would always be controversy about if a certain method of "killing" is humane" - agreed. That's not to say, though, that we shouldn't always evaluate our behaviour & keep looking for ways to improve upon it as we become hopefully more civilised & respecting of the other life we share this planet with. Yes, our treatment of many other animals is also inhumane &/or unacceptable. I have already made that point myself.
"no thus indicating that the current seal hunt is not having any affect on the harp seal population and can be sustained" - I wasn't aware that this discussion was about
sustainability of the seal slaughter. Had you not noticed that others here were more concerned about the seals welfare? My point that the current culling measures are a waste of time as a means of population control was in response to your earlier reasoning that the culling was being legitimately used as a means of population control.
"NO..this indicates that the EU is caving in, and has been influenced by a very small......" - mere speculation. If they are that easily influenced by a minority, why hasn't all the might & resources of the Canadian government & people won the vote?
"the seal hunt is the only one that continues to get the massive media attention" - nonsense. Maybe in Canada, if that is the only issue important to its people. But in the rest of the world, at least here in the UK, many other issues are regularly being publicised. The whale hunt issue that you mention, for example, has been strongly publicised & fought over for many years. The fact that Japan continues to do it exasperates me, but I guess they don't care about world opinion & are a law unto themselves.
"They only take on those that will give "them" the greatest exposure!!" - nonsense. You're rambling now! It
would be unfair if the Canadian sealers were being singled out when there is also much to be dealt with elsewhere. But I don't believe this is the case - at least not by the people promoting animal welfare. The fact that more members of the public may pick up on the seal story because of their cuteness
is true. And it annoys me when those same people may be unaware or even responsible for cruelty elsewhere. Which is why I made my first post here.
""people concerned about, & who are active in animal welfare rarely profit" ....how do you know this? from personal experience? or from hearsay...." - I know, the same way you know all the "facts" you are quoting. I think the fact that the majority of people involved are
volunteers may be a clue as to the fact that they don't profit!
"do NOT make a huge profit from this fishery" - fair point. But to me this is not the issue. One has to set standards of human behaviour which are & are not acceptable. Otherwise, the "anything goes" attitude would take over in most poor parts of the world. I would rather assist the poor in trying to help them find & develop acceptable & responsible means of making a living, than defend & let them get away with anything. What if the poorest Canadians there decided to start up a human slave trade using the wealthier Canadians as slaves? Would this be acceptable because they were poor & needed to survive?
"a wage that I would guess is much lower than what you would be accustomed to or accept" - you guess wrong. But that is largely irrelevant.
As I said, I did not single out the seal hunt myself for criticism. Yes, there are plenty of worse issues to be addressed. But that does not, & should not, mean that it shouldn't be looked at, discussed, & if necessary criticised. And since this thread was started anyway, why not contribute?
......(feel free to have the last word!........)