New drug doubles endurance, increases longevity

NINJ4

New Member
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Given that some athletes will take almost anything to gain a one percent edge in performance, what might they do for a 100 percent improvement? That temptation is made somewhat more real by a report today in a leading journal about a drug that doubles the physical endurance of mice running on treadmills. And it could only be more tempting, because the drug in question has also been reported to extend the lifespan of mice.

An ordinary lab mouse will run about one kilometer — five-eights of a mile — on a treadmill before collapsing from exhaustion. But mice given resveratrol, a minor component of red wine and other foods, run twice as far.

They also have a reduced heart rate and energy-charged muscles, just as trained athletes do, according to an article published online in Cell by Johan Auwerx and his colleagues at the Institute of Genetics and Molecular and Cellular Biology in Illkirch, France.

“Resveratrol makes you look like a trained athlete without the training,” Dr. Auwerx (pronounced OH-wer-ix”) said in an interview.

He and his colleagues said the same mechanism seems likely to operate in humans, based on their analysis, in a group of Finnish subjects, of the gene that is influenced by the drug.

Their rationale for testing resveratrol was evidence obtained three years ago that it could activate a genetic mechanism known to protect mice against the degenerative diseases of aging and to prolong their lifespan by 30 percent.

Dr. Auwerx, whose interest is in the genetic control of metabolism, decided to see if resveratrol would offset the effects of a high-fat diet, specifically the metabolic disturbances, known as metabolic syndrome, that are the precursors of diabetes and obesity.

In his report, he and his colleagues say that very large doses of resveratrol protected mice from gaining weight and from developing metabolic syndrome.

Dr. Auwerx attributes this change in large part to the significantly increased number of mitochondria he detected in the muscle cells of treated mice.

Mitochondria are the organelles within the body’s cells that generate energy. With increased mitochondria, the treated mice were able to burn off more fat and thus avoid weight gain and decreased sensitivity to insulin, Dr. Auwerx said. He found that their muscle fibers had been remodeled by the drug into the type more prevalent in trained human athletes.

Dr. Ronald M. Evans, a leading expert on the hormonal control of metabolism at the Salk Institute, said that the report by Dr. Auwerx’s team had “shown very convincingly that resveratrol improves mitochondrial function” and fends off metabolic disease.

Dr. Evans described the study as “very important, because it is rare that we identify orally active molecules, especially natural molecules, that have such a broad-based, positive effect on a problem as widespread in society as metabolic disease.”

Dr. Ronald Kahn, director of the Joslin Diabetes Center in Boston, said the research would focus attention on the sirtuins, a recently discovered group of enzymes that resveratrol is believed to affect. Noting that he is a scientific advisor to Sirtris, a company developing drugs that activate the sirtuins, Dr. Kahn said, “Certainly, drugs that act on this class of proteins have the potential to have major effects on human disease.”

Dr. Auwerx’s study complements one published earlier this month by Dr. David Sinclair of the Harvard Medical School, who found that much more moderate doses of resveratrol protected mice from the metabolic effects of a high-calorie diet. Though his mice did not lose weight, they lived far longer than undosed mice that were fed the same high-calorie diet.

The two studies were started and performed independently, Dr. Auwerx said, though he obtained supplies of resveratrol from Sirtris, which was co-founded by Dr. Sinclair, and he has become a scientific advisor to the company.

A drug that prolongs life, averts degenerative disease and, on top of all that, makes you into a champion athlete — at least if you are a mouse — sounds almost too good to be true.

Dr. Christoph Westphal, Sirtris’s chief executive, replied to this objection with a question: “Is it too good to be true that when you are young you get no disease?”

He believes that activation of the sirtuins is what keeps the body healthy in youth, but that these enzymes become less powerful with age, exposing the body to degenerative disease. That is the process that he says is reversed by resveratrol and, he hopes, by the more powerful sirtuin-activator drugs that his company is developing, though many years of clinical trials will still be needed to demonstrate whether they work and are safe to use.

The developing buzz over sirtuin activators has captivated some scientists who do research on the aging process, several of whom are already taking resveratrol themselves. Dr. Sinclair has said that he has been swallowing resveratrol capsules for three years, and that his parents and half his lab staff do the same.

So does Dr. Tomas Prolla at the University of Wisconsin. “The fact that investigators in the field are taking it is a good sign there is something there,” he said.

But many others believe taking the drug now is premature, including Dr. Leonard Guarente of M.I.T. whose 15-year study of the sirtuins laid the basis for the field of study. It was after working in Dr. Guarente’s lab as a postdoctoral student that Dr. Sinclair found in 2003 that resveratrol was a sirtuin activator.

Though resveratrol has long been known to be a component red wine and other foods, it is present there in only minuscule amounts, compared with the very large doses used in experiments. Dr. Sinclair dosed his mice daily with 22 milligrams of resveratrol for each kilogram of weight, and Dr. Auwerx used up to 400 milligrams. No one could drink enough red wine to obtain such doses.

Resveratrol is now available in capsules that contain extracts of red wine and giant knotweed, a plant found in China. One manufacturer of such capsules is Longevinex, whose president, Bill Sardi, said today that demand for the product had increased by a factor of 2400 since Nov. 1. But even Longevinex’s capsules, which at present contain 40 milligrams of resveratrol each, would have to be gulped in almost impossible quantities for a human to obtain doses equivalent to those used in mice. “It’s like eating a whole bottle of Tums every day,” Dr. Evans said.

Whether much lower doses would benefit athletic performance is not clear, Dr. Evans said. And higher doses may not be as safe as the lower doses found now in foods and “nutraceuticals” like the extract capsules.

Besides these uncertainties over what a safe and effective dose of resveratrol might be, the science underlying the field is still in full flux. Many central details are still unclear. The principal theory developed by Dr. Guarente and others is that the sirtuins somehow sense the level of energy expenditure in living cells and switch the body’s resources from reproduction to tissue maintenance when food is low.

This is an ancient strategy, Dr. Guarente believes, that allows an organism to live through famines and postpone breeding until good times return. The switch to tissue maintenance involves specific action to stave off the major degenerative diseases of aging, such as cancer, diabetes, heart disease and neurodegeneration.

Though resveratrol is in the spotlight, the central focus of researchers is on how the sirtuins are activated and what they do. One serious uncertainty is whether, in the mouse experiments, resverattrol in fact acted through the sirtuins or by some other unknown mechanism. In the latter case, Dr. Sinclair’s and Dr. Auwerx’s mouse experiments would offer less support to the sirtuin theory.

Dr. Auwerx cites evidence that resveratrol does activate sirtuin, but Dr. Evans said the case was not yet fully convincing.

Dr. Bruce Spiegelman, a Harvard Medical School expert on fat metabolism, said Dr. Auwerx’s paper was “pretty good.” Dr. Auwerx believes resveratrol activates sirtuin, which in turn activates a factor known as PGC1-alpha in a manner first described by Dr. Spiegelman and his colleagues last year. Subsequent actions by PGC1-alpha then stimulate cells to produce more mitochondria.

Increased energy production by mitochondria generates potentially dangerous reactive chemicals that are known to damage cells. So it has long been puzzling that exercise, in which energy is expended, is good for health, not bad.

Dr. Auwerx noted that Dr. Spiegelman showed in a report in the journal Cell last month that PGC1-alpha not only increases mitochondria, but at the same time generates chemicals that detoxify the energy by-products.

Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/16/s...bfe9a0f6&ei=5094&partner=homepage&oref=slogin








Personally, I think that this drug, while seeming too good to be true, will show up to have no or negligible side effects, considering its source. It is no coincidence that every civilization on the face of the planet has independently developed the art of distillation, and scientists have been saying for years that red wine is good for you, so why not exploit that a little more? The only worry I have about this drug is that it seems like the sort of signal that after a while of using it, your body would just become immune to the increased dosage, rather than continuing to help.

Is resveratrol the new wonder drug, or just a new, more natural version of steroids? Discuss.
 

swirly

Active Member
Messages
1,930
Reaction score
0
Points
36
i would want this. i just wonder what the side effects are, and how much exactly would it cost? i mean i weight train, and since football is over i need to start running again but i mean ive never been very good at running; it has always been a very tough exercise for me. this would be a great help.
 

Chris Z

Active Member
Messages
5,603
Reaction score
0
Points
36
same here, i totally hate runnning and have never gotten even a B on a 1 mile run
 

IIN Operator

New Member
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Points
0
None of the drugs on the market are worth using. The side effects are much worse than the minor ailments they cure.

Well, Jose Canseco does claim that steroids enlarge your penis size, prolong your life span, increase your athletic performance, and improve as well as preserve your looks, even long after you stop using them. I think those claims are a big joke.

Of course, the FDA approval standards are incredibly lax. Ritalin is basically cocaine for 4th graders, but the FDA is yet to outlaw it despite numerous deaths. Other drugs are frequently pulled after hazardous side effects are discovered. Still other drugs actually do nothing and are prescribed by doctors because of the placebo effect.
 

stealth_thunder

New Member
Messages
556
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Wow that is crazy, will you be addicted if you use this for a long term? I mean some people will definitely abuse these drugs to do illegal stuff to the society. I hope the research never been done in the first place. The advantages are all stated are they excluding the disadvantages and the association to different development of crime.
 

Ferinos

New Member
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Increasing the lifetime, of a human being, whether possible or not, is unethical. If you increase one persons lifespan, everyone wants their lifespan increased. This means, the death ratio goes down, while the birth ratio stays the same. Look at it, as water flowing through a pipe out of your bath. The taps are running, and are releasing around a gallo a minute, at a rough guess, and if the drain can only cope with 3/4 of a gallon a minute, that means if you leave the taps running for 5 minutes, with the plug out, you will have a and a quarter gallons of water in your bath. Keep doing this for ever, and your bath, surprisingly enough, OVERFLOWS.

It's the same for population. Africa, as we are always being told, is having a population crisis, Britain is having a population crisis with immigrants, as are various other countries. If you increase lifespan by ten years, and a quarter of the world's population gets their lifespan increased by ten years each, that means birth rates will be the same, if not higher, depending how old couples are when they reproduce, and death rates will go down.

Like with your bath, the world will overflow, in other words, we won't all fit on the planet in 1000 years, and at the very least it will be extremely crowded.

By the way, please do not get me in trouble with your mummies and daddies by trying my little bathtub experiment, if you want to do it, don't hold me responsible for your retarded actions xD.

And I used to know this kid that would have done that then blamed me. Sad dumb little child.
 

Rufio1

New Member
Messages
154
Reaction score
0
Points
0
yea i love about these types of drugs is that, yes they'll make whatever is targeted better, but take everything else our on the way there. It all comes to do the benefits out way the risks.
 

SolarParhelion

New Member
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Points
0
I'm not sure that releasing such a drug as a legal, accepted substance would be unethical, but I do agree somewhat with the "overflow" theory concerning population -- the thing is, though, that its very unlikely that introducing the drug into society is going to have such an adverse effect all on its own.

It is without a doubt that whoever gains marketing rights for the substance would excessively mark the price up, even though its a naturally-occuring chemical. People already do it with water, air, and dirt.

That will knock out almost all general use among the lower classes of society, with the exception of those who may find a way to "create" their own (at a high risk of creating something dangerous and committing an illegal act). It isn't like welfare is going to pay for it. So right there, you'll have a Miracle Drug that is only available to middle or high society (and the 'middle' is quickly becoming nonexistant).

This isn't something that is going to just 'appear' all over the world in the hands of everyone. It may become a common item in pharmacies in America or Europe, but I somehow doubt 'resveratrol' will become a household word in areas like Africa or certain parts of Asia.

The effect this drug will have on crime will probably be as noteable as welfare's effect on crime. Welfare != Crime; it can contribute, by encouraging rabbit-breeding among the impoverished, who's progeny are then raised in an environment which is inductive of crime and the "Us vs. Them" mentality, but it is not a direct cause. If this in any way supports crime, it will be because of a lack of supply and availability.

As for addiction... smoking, drinking, and gambling are addictions. And those actually hurt you and those around you.
 

Ferinos

New Member
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Trouble with smoking is, if everyone in the UK stopped smoking for a month, EVERYONE, the government would encourage them to take it up again, because take the tax there is on cigarretes and cigars etc etc. The money the government would lose would be huge, and they don't seem to realise that. Dumb bunch of aholes
 

SolarParhelion

New Member
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Trouble with smoking is, if everyone in the UK stopped smoking for a month, EVERYONE, the government would encourage them to take it up again, because take the tax there is on cigarretes and cigars etc etc. The money the government would lose would be huge, and they don't seem to realise that. Dumb bunch of aholes


I agree with you; the same goes for drinking in the United States. I sort of lumped in taxation and the effects on economy such a drug would have in my explaination of the private markup, without really thinking that it would be an obvious consideration for anyone reading my post -- guess I sort of just skipped it.

As for the safety of the drug.. no drug is absolutely universally safe. Your body is a beautiful machine of hundreds of complex chemical reactions; just because something looks like it's going to be a wonder drug after a few years of testing on rats doesn't mean that it won't have any consequences far down the road for humans -- nevermind the different effects it could have on people with detected or undetected imbalances.
 

Bonekhan

New Member
Messages
226
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Why the hell did I think, upon reading the title of this topic: Oh, wow, the new Viagra?

But all joking aside, I think that, if no adverse side effects comes from the drug, why shouldn't ALL athletes be able to take it, so no one gets an unfair advantage, rather than barring it from sports and having half the competitors taking under the table medication.
 
Top