- Messages
- 6,517
- Reaction score
- 48
- Points
- 48
Well, two years ago Australia used to be one of the only nations that had ISPs that cap. Now, within the last year, many ISPs in the US and a few in the UK have begun capping users or starting trials, or stating plans to do so. One thing I don't understand is other than the urge for companies who are already successful to nickel and dime people, why is it that carriers want to restrict the amount of bandwidth people can use these days and then charge them ludicrous fees for something that costs virtually nothing? For example, a recent case involving Time Warner, states that Time Warner after a user goes over their allowed threshold of bandwidth, will be charged $1 a gigabyte they user. Now, based on information I've found on the internet, it only costs an ISP less than a penny to even transfer a gigabyte throughout their network, or at least a penny or two to another carrier. Now, I'm not trying to put one company on the spot, but as of right now, Verizon (who I have as an ISP) has been the only company in the US that has stated that they are not going to cap or throttle, and they are the same guys building out a fully fiber optic network. Many of the other known companies out there have either already began capping users or started trials, or have plans to do so.
Well, given this day in age where you can drain a gigabyte a data in no time (tell me about it, I'm doing a couple hundred gigabytes a month), what is your opinion on broadband capping? Broadband was designed to be able to run with unlimited use, not to have meters attached to it, and this is one topic that upsets me when I see it in the news.
Well, given this day in age where you can drain a gigabyte a data in no time (tell me about it, I'm doing a couple hundred gigabytes a month), what is your opinion on broadband capping? Broadband was designed to be able to run with unlimited use, not to have meters attached to it, and this is one topic that upsets me when I see it in the news.
Last edited: