Packet loss ewwww

[dWhite]

Yucky!

daniel@daniel-laptop:~$ ping x10hosting.com
PING x10hosting.com (99.198.123.240) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from new.x10hosting.com (99.198.123.240): icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=77.1 ms
64 bytes from new.x10hosting.com (99.198.123.240): icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=129 ms
64 bytes from new.x10hosting.com (99.198.123.240): icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=83.8 ms
64 bytes from new.x10hosting.com (99.198.123.240): icmp_seq=4 ttl=52 time=62.6 ms
From new.x10hosting.com (99.198.123.240) icmp_seq=5 Destination Port Unreachable
64 bytes from new.x10hosting.com (99.198.123.240): icmp_seq=10 ttl=52 time=44.5 ms
64 bytes from new.x10hosting.com (99.198.123.240): icmp_seq=12 ttl=52 time=79.1 ms
64 bytes from new.x10hosting.com (99.198.123.240): icmp_seq=13 ttl=52 time=47.7 ms
64 bytes from new.x10hosting.com (99.198.123.240): icmp_seq=14 ttl=52 time=108 ms
64 bytes from new.x10hosting.com (99.198.123.240): icmp_seq=15 ttl=52 time=52.0 ms
64 bytes from new.x10hosting.com (99.198.123.240): icmp_seq=16 ttl=52 time=47.8 ms
64 bytes from new.x10hosting.com (99.198.123.240): icmp_seq=17 ttl=52 time=77.1 ms
64 bytes from new.x10hosting.com (99.198.123.240): icmp_seq=18 ttl=52 time=47.6 ms
64 bytes from new.x10hosting.com (99.198.123.240): icmp_seq=19 ttl=52 time=56.2 ms
64 bytes from new.x10hosting.com (99.198.123.240): icmp_seq=20 ttl=52 time=50.1 ms
64 bytes from new.x10hosting.com (99.198.123.240): icmp_seq=21 ttl=52 time=91.5 ms
^C64 bytes from new.x10hosting.com (99.198.123.240): icmp_seq=22 ttl=52 time=95.5 ms

--- x10hosting.com ping statistics ---
22 packets transmitted, 16 received, +1 errors, 27% packet loss, time 25332ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 44.523/71.988/129.973/24.510 ms
daniel@daniel-laptop:~$

 

[lemon-tree]

Not a problem at x10's end though, more likely something gone wrong with your routing or at your ISP. Not the fastest ping response, but it a response nonetheless.

ping -c 10 x10hosting.com
PING x10hosting.com (99.198.123.240): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 99.198.123.240: icmp_seq=0 ttl=47 time=135.873 ms
64 bytes from 99.198.123.240: icmp_seq=1 ttl=47 time=135.940 ms
64 bytes from 99.198.123.240: icmp_seq=2 ttl=47 time=134.605 ms
64 bytes from 99.198.123.240: icmp_seq=3 ttl=47 time=137.439 ms
64 bytes from 99.198.123.240: icmp_seq=4 ttl=47 time=135.110 ms
64 bytes from 99.198.123.240: icmp_seq=5 ttl=47 time=133.764 ms
64 bytes from 99.198.123.240: icmp_seq=6 ttl=47 time=134.052 ms
64 bytes from 99.198.123.240: icmp_seq=7 ttl=47 time=143.569 ms
64 bytes from 99.198.123.240: icmp_seq=8 ttl=47 time=133.379 ms
64 bytes from 99.198.123.240: icmp_seq=9 ttl=47 time=134.153 ms

--- x10hosting.com ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 133.379/135.788/143.569/2.842 ms

 

[galaxyAbstractor]

Ping statistics for 99.198.123.240:
Packets: Sent = 50, Received = 50, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 111ms, Maximum = 125ms, Average = 116ms

What sort of result do you get when you run http://www.pingtest.net/ ?

 

[dWhite]

I know lemon, you apparently didn't get the point of the topic.

I was making a statement that packet loss = yucky!

 

[Sharky]

I think it's lemon-tree stealing your bandwidths

 

[lemon-tree]

Only 27% of it, give me a break

 

[dWhite]

Only 27% of it, give me a break

27% too much.