Please Rate Honestly

[unpixelatedgamers]

I find it really funny that you're comparing the w3c's website to the "limitations" of w3c compliant code. w3c's website is not designed to be "Web 2.0" there is no reason why w3c should need a web 2.0 looking site and it would seem out of place in their extremely professional and direct area on the web.

I was digging at their motto. I mean, thier website hardly represents the "full potential" of the internet. More from a design view than content.

Oh, and you've lost a notch in my book for disliking the GECKO rendering engine.

I only dislike the colours in the standard FF2 distribution, they leave a really bad taste in my mouth. And you know, first impressions count. And if those impressions are "ugh, thats ugly" its not going to endear people to continue using it when most people have a, IMO better looking, alternative already.

I'm only harsh because I care. :biggrin: MS needs some real competition in the PC space.

 

[Zenax]

I can't figure it out. Your code seems to be fine and there is no problem with any of the CSS or something.

However IE reads CSS differently to FF. IE applys padding including the page padding however FF doesnt.

Try this: http://www.search-this.com/2007/03/12/no-margin-for-error/

 

[Mr. Pig]

I was digging at their motto. I mean, thier website hardly represents the "full potential" of the internet. More from a design view than content.

Ah, noted. Although a graphically ugly web page could represent more "potential" of the web (such as an ugly advanced Ajax site? - Pre-public Google Docs!?!).

 

[amr1991]

Stop hijacking my thread.

 

[KowKing]

Stop hijacking my thread.

By the way, there's nothing wrong with the W3C...

 

[amr1991]

I feel bad for the guy that has a gun by his head.