David
IRC: For Cool People!
- Messages
- 288
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 0
Note: While this Resolution was used in the 2007 National Congressional Qualifiers, I authored this Resolution on behalf of Hempfield Area Senior High School and presented the Authorship speech at the qualifier for this particular Resolution. (Included only in the event someone else here was at that tournament and thought that I might be plagiarizing it, for whatever reason.)
A Resolution Abolishing Abstinence-Only Education
1. Whereas teen pregnancy rates in the US is twice that of any other
2. industrialized nation in the world.
3. Whereas more than 1 million teen girls become pregnant each year.
4. Whereas abstinence-only education does not inform students of the risks of
5. unprotected sex.
6. Whereas students who receive non-abstinence-only education are less likely
7. to contract a sexually transmitted disease and become pregnant.
8. Whereas abstinence-only education does not teach students about the
9. benefits of condoms or other contraceptives.
10. Be it resolved by this Student Congress here assembled that all schools
11. shall discontinue all sex-education curriculums teaching abstinence-only
12. education immediately and implement a new sex education curriculum
13. teaching safe sex. Failure to comply shall result in interference by the
14. Department of Education.
Yes, this topic is a little risque, but since sex education is now being given to students as young as 13 in many places, I felt that it was appropriate. Further, this is a serious issue, and this is Crossfire, isn't it, or did my mouse skip and land somewhere completely different? (I find the later unlikely.)
At any rate, I can't wait to debate with all of you. While traditional Student Congress does not provide for a "floor debate" (what you see during election season) and only for pointed questions, that would seriously hinder discussion here, so an open floor debate is actually encouraged.
I do ask that when attempting to evidence or disprove a statement above that you reference line numbers (they're from the original document and required for Congressional Bill and Resolution submissions).
Having Authored this Resolution, I'm obviously all for it. (Not always the case, I've Authored my fair share of Devil's advocate Bills and Resolutions. ) Of course I myself could think of many, many arguments in opposition to this, and just as many in favour of this, but the point is unplanned teen pregnancy is running rampant across the world, not to mention the HIV/AIDS epidemic, yes it's an epidemic, with millions infected each year.
There will obviously be those of you who will, as quickly as possible of course, muck out a response along the lines of not having sex to begin with is the only effective method to prevent pregnancy or contracting an STD. You would be right, however, we as parents, teachers, guardians, and role models can say "Don't have sex" until we're blue in the face, forgive the cliche, but the point is our teens are still having sex, and are continuing to do so. So wouldn't the better option be that we teach our teens and even pre-teens how to make an informed, well educated decision about sex.
Sex is a huge step in any teenage relationship, and sadly many of our nations youth are walking into it blind. Some abstinence-only curriculums teach that condoms are rarely effective, whereas in truth had they just used a condom hundreds of thousands of children could have avoided pregnancy. Our children do not have to be timebombs, just waiting to go off, and by "go off" I mean inevitible death. Sex without a condom is comparable to playing Russian Roulette, and our children, our future, should know this.
--David
A Resolution Abolishing Abstinence-Only Education
1. Whereas teen pregnancy rates in the US is twice that of any other
2. industrialized nation in the world.
3. Whereas more than 1 million teen girls become pregnant each year.
4. Whereas abstinence-only education does not inform students of the risks of
5. unprotected sex.
6. Whereas students who receive non-abstinence-only education are less likely
7. to contract a sexually transmitted disease and become pregnant.
8. Whereas abstinence-only education does not teach students about the
9. benefits of condoms or other contraceptives.
10. Be it resolved by this Student Congress here assembled that all schools
11. shall discontinue all sex-education curriculums teaching abstinence-only
12. education immediately and implement a new sex education curriculum
13. teaching safe sex. Failure to comply shall result in interference by the
14. Department of Education.
Respecfully Submitted
Hempfield Area Senior High School
Hempfield Area Senior High School
Yes, this topic is a little risque, but since sex education is now being given to students as young as 13 in many places, I felt that it was appropriate. Further, this is a serious issue, and this is Crossfire, isn't it, or did my mouse skip and land somewhere completely different? (I find the later unlikely.)
At any rate, I can't wait to debate with all of you. While traditional Student Congress does not provide for a "floor debate" (what you see during election season) and only for pointed questions, that would seriously hinder discussion here, so an open floor debate is actually encouraged.
I do ask that when attempting to evidence or disprove a statement above that you reference line numbers (they're from the original document and required for Congressional Bill and Resolution submissions).
Having Authored this Resolution, I'm obviously all for it. (Not always the case, I've Authored my fair share of Devil's advocate Bills and Resolutions. ) Of course I myself could think of many, many arguments in opposition to this, and just as many in favour of this, but the point is unplanned teen pregnancy is running rampant across the world, not to mention the HIV/AIDS epidemic, yes it's an epidemic, with millions infected each year.
There will obviously be those of you who will, as quickly as possible of course, muck out a response along the lines of not having sex to begin with is the only effective method to prevent pregnancy or contracting an STD. You would be right, however, we as parents, teachers, guardians, and role models can say "Don't have sex" until we're blue in the face, forgive the cliche, but the point is our teens are still having sex, and are continuing to do so. So wouldn't the better option be that we teach our teens and even pre-teens how to make an informed, well educated decision about sex.
Sex is a huge step in any teenage relationship, and sadly many of our nations youth are walking into it blind. Some abstinence-only curriculums teach that condoms are rarely effective, whereas in truth had they just used a condom hundreds of thousands of children could have avoided pregnancy. Our children do not have to be timebombs, just waiting to go off, and by "go off" I mean inevitible death. Sex without a condom is comparable to playing Russian Roulette, and our children, our future, should know this.
--David
Last edited: