Search results

what happens when you leave out "DESC" ? as far as i know this keyword already reverses your result (but i'm no SQL guru :) )

CSS loads as expected, but your background image is missing also you should quote that: background-image: url('images/background.png'); EDIT: i've meant the url('path/to/image.png') thing...

http://www.milw0rm.com/ exploit and vulnerability database (seems to be down at the moment)

as google says: http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=156412 http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=92865 http://labnol.blogspot.com/2005/09/clear-google-web-cache-delete-404.html EDIT: my suggestion would be to register at google...

i believe you on that but you can read on several sources the onload event will be triggered immediately after the page has finished loading: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/interact/scripts.html#adef-onload http://www.w3schools.com/jsref/event_onload.asp...

Wouldn't onLoad be triggered when the document is finished loading ?

I don't think you can really "learn" creativity, but that's just an personal opinion. "What colors go with what, what font goes where" is a science on it's own, i guess. :) just a few links: http://www.interaction-design.org/encyclopedia/gestalt_principles_of_form_perception.html...

I've made up an little website with SiteReptile Website Builder some time ago, and as far as i can remember it validated fine on http://validator.w3.org/ and http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/ . Checking again yesterday i noticed this isn't the case anymore, the template is still the same (and...

They should be fine. :) You can test the most common SQL(or XSS)-injection attacks against your forms automatically with the firefox-extension "SQL Inject-Me" (or "XSS-me") which is part of the "Exploit-Me" Suite. List of useful Firefox Extensions on my site. (the last one in "Security auditing")

uhmm.. don't know.. why would you want to do that? btw, I'm no windows expert (haven't even used it in the last 3 years, except for gaming).

That's the point of "Active Directory", you don't have to run from one client to another. By sharing for example "storage$", the share wouldn't show off in network explorer, but can be accessed and mapped as network drive by typing in the full share name on the client.

you can hide windows shares by adding an dollar sign ($) at the end of the share name ..or just not share it at all

(visited only http://paperhub.x10hosting.com/links.php ) My suggestion would be to use POST instead of GET in every form, and to use pre-fabricated query's (if possible). eg. if ( POST_ob == name && POST_o == asc) // query, no variables in here else if ( POST_ob == added && POST_o == desc)...

Thanks for your fine logo! It's now up on http://backhendlwirt.co.cc/ and i think it perfectly fits in there. :) If you want i can include an (hidden, but google won't care) backlink to your site on the main page: <div style="visibility:hidden"> <a href="http://logodrom.org">logo design</a>...

That's true (most of the times). People get married because they think "they have to" or "it won't get any better.." (which may be true :P ), or (insert random stupid argument here). I've seen this many times, and it doesn't make any sense to me.

i like wlan stuff.. :) your USB adapter (150Mbps) may limit the performance of your NIC (600Mbps?), but i'm not sure on that.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11n but you can tune your WiFi: try another (less or unused) channel (there are only a few non-overlapping channels)...

adjust the metric: http://windowsitpro.com/article/articleid/27315/what-is-windows-xps-automatic-metric-feature.html http://support.microsoft.com/kb/299540 (don't know if that works on win7)

Voted for PHP because it's easy to quickly hack up an little script. But Python has a little bit more horsepower, i think. ASP looks pretty ugly for me, as well as PERL (no doubt it's an powerful language). :)

Theoretically, you could assign each network card it's own IP, adjust the routing table accordingly and download stuff a little bit faster. But i doubt that would make much sense.. My suggestion would be to use the new card to connect to the accesspoint and just keep the other one to play...

It looks really nice, but takes forever to load on my crappy modem. Also you've got lots of validation errors: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.aaronbaltazar.co.cc&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0&user-agent=W3C_Validator%2F1.654...